Martin Hayman on the Uneasy Alliance Between SEO and Writing

· 2 min read
Martin Hayman on the Uneasy Alliance Between SEO and Writing

Why Consultants and Authors Rarely Agree at First

Martin Hayman once said nothing ruins a good sentence faster than handing it to someone obsessed with rankings https://uk.linkedin.com/in/martinhayman. That's really the heart of the disagreement. An SEO consultant looks at a page and sees data points. A writer looks at the same page and sees a story trying to breathe. Both have a point. Neither one will say so out loud.



Here's the thing nobody tells new writers: keywords are not the enemy. Clumsy keyword placement is the real problem. A consultant delivers a list of terms pulled straight from search data, and suddenly the author has to work those words into the copy without reading like a glitchy machine. Attempt to fit "best waterproof hiking boots for wide feet" into one paragraph three separate times and still come across as a person. Think of it as a riddle, not a sentence to be served.

One Deadline, Two Very Different Brains

Picture a kitchen. The SEO side acts like the nutritionist, tallying nutrients and watching what's needed. The author plays chef, aiming for a dish worth eating a second time. You need both people in the room, or you end up with either a bland spreadsheet of a blog post or a gorgeous essay that ranks nowhere on page one.

Disagreements crop up early. A consultant flags a paragraph for missing a target term. The author pushes back because cramming it in wrecks the rhythm. Usually a compromise word appears that search engines still credit, and the line lives on. This little tug-of-war repeats dozens of times per piece, mostly unnoticed.

When Google Shifts the Rules Halfway Through

Search algorithms shift. A page that ranked beautifully in March can vanish by June. That's when the working relationship really gets put to the test. One side wants a rewrite. The other half, worn out, would rather leave things untouched. Good teams argue this out over coffee, not email threads that drag for a week.

Strong pairings act like co-pilots, not competitors. The consultant supplies the map. The other brings the voice. Leave one out and the audience notices, even if they can't pinpoint the reason. A page stuffed with phrases but no personality reads like elevator music. A gorgeous essay buried on page four of search results might as well not exist.

What Actually Works

Quick check-ins matter more than lengthy strategy decks. A five-minute phone call outperforms a twelve-page brief nobody bothers rereading. Writers who understand basic search behavior write faster, cleaner drafts. Consultants who care about pacing stop demanding exact-match phrases that sound machine-generated.

Splitting off into separate corners never produces a winner here. The posts that genuinely perform, the kind people save and pass along, come out of writers and consultants who bicker a bit, joke a bit, and meet halfway. That middle ground is where the good stuff lives.